Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4)
Latest & greatest articles for verapamil
The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on verapamil or other clinical topics then use Trip today.
This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on verapamil and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.
What is Trip?
Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.
Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.
As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.
For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via email@example.com
Verapamil Top results for verapamil - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Find evidence fast ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4 (...) ) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for verapamil The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted
The relative efficacy of adenosine versus verapamil for the treatment of stable paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in adults: a meta-analysis Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Untitled Document The CRD Databases will not be available from 08:00 BST on Friday 4th October until 08:00 BST on Monday 7th October for essential maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.
Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial. Hypertensive patients are often given a calcium antagonist to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, but the benefit compared with other drug classes is controversial.To determine whether initial therapy with controlled-onset extended-release (COER) verapamil is equivalent to a physician's choice of atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide in preventing cardiovascular disease.Double-blind (...) , randomized clinical trial conducted at 661 centers in 15 countries. A total of 16 602 participants diagnosed as having hypertension and who had 1 or more additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease were enrolled between September 1996 and December 1998 and followed up until December 31, 2000. After a mean of 3 years of follow-up, the sponsor closed the study before unblinding the results.Initially, 8241 participants received 180 mg of COER verapamil and 8361 received either 50 mg of atenolol
A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial. Despite evidence of efficacy of antihypertensive agents in treating hypertensive patients, safety and efficacy of antihypertensive agents for coronary artery disease (CAD) have been discerned only from subgroup analyses in large trials.To compare mortality and morbidity outcomes (...) in patients with hypertension and CAD treated with a calcium antagonist strategy (CAS) or a non-calcium antagonist strategy (NCAS).Randomized, open label, blinded end point study of 22 576 hypertensive CAD patients aged 50 years or older, which was conducted September 1997 to February 2003 at 862 sites in 14 countries.Patients were randomly assigned to either CAS (verapamil sustained release) or NCAS (atenolol). Strategies specified dose and additional drug regimens. Trandolapril
Diltiazem, nifedipine, nimodipine or verapamil for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially disfiguring movement disorder of the orofacial region often caused by use of neuroleptic drugs. A wide range of strategies have been used to help manage TD and, for those who are unable to have their antipsychotic medication stopped or substantially changed, the calcium-channel blocking group of drugs (diltiazem, nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil) has been
Verapamil use in patients with cardiovascular disease: an overview of randomized trials Verapamil use in patients with cardiovascular disease: an overview of randomized trials Verapamil use in patients with cardiovascular disease: an overview of randomized trials Pepine C J, Faich G, Makuch R Authors' objectives To present an overview of randomised trials investigating the use of verapamil in patients with cardiovascular disease. Searching MEDLINE was searched from January 1966 to April 1997 (...) ) using the keyword 'verapamil' alone and in combination with the following terms: 'clinical trial', 'MI', 'angina', and 'hypertension'. Further searches of the Science Citation Index and Current Contents were carried out (search dates unclear). All of the searches were limited to publications in the English language. The bibliographies of retrieved articles and other reviews were also examined for additional studies. Three investigators knowledgeable with the verapamil literature reviewed the final
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of cancer in randomized, controlled trials of verapamil A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of cancer in randomized, controlled trials of verapamil A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of cancer in randomized, controlled trials of verapamil Dong E W, Connelly J E, Borden S P, Yorzyk W, Passov D G, Kupelnick B, Luo D H, Ross S D Authors' objectives To assess the incidence of cancer in patients receiving (...) verapamil for the treatment of hypertension, angina pectoris or cardiac arrhythmias. Searching Medlars was searched from 1966 to October 20, 1996 for trials conducted in humans, using the MeSH term 'verapamil'. During the course of the project, Current Contents was also searched on a weekly basis. The searches were limited to papers published in the English language. The reference lists of all the retrieved clinical trials and review articles were also examined, and an attempt was made to obtain
Verapamil versus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension: results of long term double blind comparative trial. Verapamil versus Diuretic (VERDI) Trial Research Group. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of hydrochlorothiazide, sustained release verapamil, and their combination in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.Randomised multicentre trial of 48 weeks' duration with a double blind comparison of hydrochlorothiazide and verapamil followed by an open trial of combined (...) treatment for patients not achieving the target diastolic blood pressure (less than 90 mm Hg) during treatment with a single drug.Outpatient departments in 10 clinics and 10 private practices of general practitioners or internists.369 Hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 95-120 mm Hg during a placebo run in period of two weeks.Initial treatment consisted of 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (n = 187) or 120 mg sustained release verapamil (n = 182) once daily (regimen I). If the target
Treating hypertension in black compared with white non-insulin dependent diabetics: a double blind trial of verapamil and metoprolol. To compare responses of blood pressure to the calcium antagonist verapamil and the beta blocker metoprolol in black compared with white diabetics with hypertension and to monitor urinary albumin excretion in relation to fall in blood pressure.Double blind, placebo controlled, random order crossover trial with four week placebo run in period and two six week (...) active phases separated by a two week placebo washout period.Outpatient department of a general hospital in a multiethnic health department. Patients--Diabetic patients with hypertension. Four dropped out before randomisation; 25 black and 14 white patients completed the trial.Patients given slow release verapamil 120 mg or 240 mg twice daily with placebo or metoprolol 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily with placebo. Treatment for diabetes (diet alone or with oral hypoglycaemic drugs) remained
A comparison of verapamil and propranolol for the initial treatment of hypertension. Racial differences in response. We compared verapamil and propranolol hydrochloride for monotherapy of hypertension. Verapamil lowered blood pressure (BP) more effectively than propranolol in black and white patients. Verapamil was equally effective in blacks and whites, whereas propranolol was more effective in whites. Heart rate was reduced by 6.0 beats per minute by verapamil, and by 13.6 beats per minute (...) by propranolol. In blacks, verapamil lowered systolic BP 16.9 vs 8.1 mm Hg for propranolol; verapamil reduced diastolic BP 12.8 vs 8.6 mm Hg for propranolol. In whites, verapamil lowered systolic BP 19.0 vs 12.7 mm Hg for propranolol; verapamil reduced diastolic BP 16.7 vs 12.3 mm Hg for propranolol. Increases in systolic BP were observed in 22% and 3.4% of patients receiving propranolol and verapamil, respectively. The PR interval was increased from 163.5 to 174.9 ms for verapamil vs 160.3 to 164.4 ms
Effect of verapamil on catecholamine secretion by human pheochromocytoma. 3744473 1986 10 16 2018 11 30 0194-911X 8 9 1986 Sep Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) Hypertension Effect of verapamil on catecholamine secretion by human pheochromocytoma. 813-4 Mannelli M M DeFeo M L ML Maggi M M Geppetti P P Baldi E E Pupilli C C Serio M M eng Clinical Trial Letter Randomized Controlled Trial United States Hypertension 7906255 0194-911X 0 Catecholamines CJ0O37KU29 Verapamil IM Adrenal Gland Neoplasms (...) metabolism Catecholamines metabolism Humans Pheochromocytoma metabolism Verapamil 1986 9 1 1986 9 1 0 1 1986 9 1 0 0 ppublish 3744473
Verapamil prophylaxis of migraine. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. We undertook a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the effectiveness of verapamil hydrochloride for the prophylaxis of migraine. Twelve patients were given either verapamil hydrochloride, 80 mg four times daily, or placebo in random order during two consecutive three-month periods. Migraine frequency, severity, and duration were quantified by daily logs and monthly questionnaires. Ten of the 12 patients (...) had fewer migraines during verapamil therapy. Migraine frequency decreased from 6.7 to 3.8 migraines per patient per month, for a mean decrease of 49%. Headache unit index fell from an average of 0.61 to 0.44. We conclude that verapamil is effective in the prophylaxis of migraine and that verapamil might be considered one alternative in the development of a regimen for the prophylaxis of migraine.
A controlled trial of verapamil for Prinzmetal's variant angina. To assess the efficacy and safety of verapamil in variant angina pectoris, we entered 16 patients in a double-blind, randomized trial of nine months, duration. During treatment with verapamil, the frequency of angina fell substantially (12.6 +/- 25.9 chest pains per week with placebo, 1.7 +/- 2.8 pains per week with verapamil, mean +/- S.D.; P less than 0.01), as did the use of nitroglycerin tablets (14.4 +/- 34.4 tablets per week (...) with placebo, 2.1 +/- 3.3 tablets per week with verapamil; P less than 0.05). The number of hospitalizations for clinical instability was significantly lower with verapamil (P less than 0.01). The number of episodes of transient ST-segment deviation during treatment with verapamil was reduced (33.1 +/- 39.3 ST-segment deviations per week with placebo, 7.7 +/- 11.7 deviations per week with verapamil; P less than 0.01). Verapamil caused no side effects forcing a reduction in dosage or a discontinuation. We
Verapamil in chronic stable angina. A controlled study with computerized multistage treadmill exercise. The efficacy of verapamil (360 mg daily) in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris was compared with placebo. 28 patients were studied in a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial of 2 weeks each and afterwards on long-term verapamil. Exercise tests were performed at the end f the placebo period, and after 2 weeks and 4 weeks on verapamil. On placebo, angina (...) developed in all 28 patients during treadmill tests; the mean exercise time was 6.6 min (SEM +/- 0.5 min). The mean exercise time increased to 9.2 (+/- 0.8) min at 2 weeks, and 11.2 (+/- 0.8) min at 4 weeks on verapamil. In 15 and 20 patients out of the 28 angina did not develop during treadmill exercise at 2 and 4 weeks respectively. Trinitrin consumption also decreased. There was a significant improvement in ST-segment changes. Constipation (in 7 patients) and reversible PR-interval prolongation (in 2