Latest & greatest articles for breast cancer screening

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on breast cancer screening or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on breast cancer screening and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for breast cancer screening

1. Breast screening: interval cancers and duty of candour toolkit

Breast screening: interval cancers and duty of candour toolkit Breast screening: interval cancers and duty of candour toolkit - GOV.UK Tell us whether you accept cookies We use about how you use GOV.UK. We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve government services. Accept all cookies You’ve accepted all cookies. You can at any time. Hide Show or hide search Search on GOV.UK Search Menu Guidance and support Take action now for new rules in 2021 Guidance (...) Breast screening: interval cancers and duty of candour toolkit Guidance on the role of breast screening and symptomatic services in identifying interval cancer and giving results to female patients. Published 11 December 2017 Last updated 24 November 2020 — From: Documents Ref: PHE Gateway number 2017648 HTML Ref: PHE Gateway number 2017648 PDF , 194KB , 1 page This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format. If you use assistive technology

2020 Public Health England

2. Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT Full Text available with Trip Pro

Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT Journals Library An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again. >> >> >> Page Not Found Page not found (404) Sorry - the page you requested could not be found. Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website (...) search above to find the information you need. >> >> >> >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }} Toolkit 1)"> 0)"> 1)"> {{metadata.Title}} {{metadata.Headline}} Annual mammography screening at ages 40 49 years conferred a reduction in breast cancer mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years. {{author}} {{($index , , , , , , , , , , , , & . Stephen Duffy 1, * , Daniel Vulkan 1 , Howard Cuckle 2 , Dharmishta Parmar 1 , Shama Sheikh 3 , Robert Smith 4 , Andrew Evans 5 , Oleg Blyuss 1 , Louise Johns 3 , Ian

2020 NIHR HTA programme

3. Multicomponent Interventions to Improve Screening for Breast, Cervical or Colorectal Cancer

Multicomponent Interventions to Improve Screening for Breast, Cervical or Colorectal Cancer Oregon Health Authority : Evidence-based Reports Blog : Health Evidence Review Commission : State of Oregon menu Toggle Main Menu Main Navigation close search Search search Submit You are here: Evidence-based Reports Blog menu Site Navigation Evidence-based Reports Blog Full Width Column 1 Select Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Acellular Dermal Matrix for Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction Compliance (...) ={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'audit') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+ '/_layouts/15/Reporting.aspx' +'?Category=Auditing&backtype=item&ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;} if(pageid == 'config') {STSNavigate(unescape(decodeURI('{SiteUrl}'))+ '/_layouts/15/expirationconfig.aspx' +'?ID={ItemId}&List={ListId}'); return false;}}, null); 0x0 0x1 ContentType 0x01 898 BlogTopic Multicomponent Interventions to Improve Screening for Breast, Cervical or Colorectal Cancer

2020 Oregon Health Evidence Review Commission

4. Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study. (Abstract)

Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study. Surveillance with annual mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for female survivors of childhood cancer treated with chest radiation, yet benefits, harms, and costs are uncertain.To compare the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening strategies in childhood cancer (...) survivors.Collaborative simulation modeling using 2 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network breast cancer models.Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and published data.Women aged 20 years with a history of chest radiotherapy.Lifetime.Payer.Annual MRI with or without mammography, starting at age 25, 30, or 35 years.Breast cancer deaths averted, false-positive screening results, benign biopsy results, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).Lifetime breast cancer mortality risk without screening

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine

5. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study. To evaluate the long term risks of invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed through breast screening.Population based observational cohort study.Data from the NHS Breast Screening Programme and the National Cancer Registration and Analysis (...) treatment (mastectomy, radiotherapy for women who had breast conserving surgery, and endocrine treatment in oestrogen receptor positive disease) and those with larger final surgical margins had lower rates of invasive breast cancer.To date, women with DCIS detected by screening have, on average, experienced higher long term risks of invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer than women in the general population during a period of at least two decades after their diagnosis. More intensive

2020 BMJ

6. Continuation of Annual Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women Older Than 70 Years. (Abstract)

Continuation of Annual Screening Mammography and Breast Cancer Mortality in Women Older Than 70 Years. Randomized trials have shown that initiating breast cancer screening between ages 50 and 69 years and continuing it for 10 years decreases breast cancer mortality. However, no trials have studied whether or when women can safely stop screening mammography. An estimated 52% of women aged 75 years or older undergo screening mammography in the United States.To estimate the effect of breast cancer (...) screening on breast cancer mortality in Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years.Large-scale, population-based, observational study of 2 screening strategies: continuing annual mammography, and stopping screening.U.S. Medicare program, 2000 to 2008.1 058 013 beneficiaries aged 70 to 84 years who had a life expectancy of at least 10 years, had no previous breast cancer diagnosis, and underwent screening mammography.Eight-year breast cancer mortality, incidence, and treatments, plus the positive

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine

7. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. Improved screening methods for women with dense breasts are needed because of their increased risk of breast cancer and of failed early diagnosis by screening mammography.To compare the screening performance of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women with dense breasts.Cross-sectional (...) study with longitudinal follow-up at 48 academic, community hospital, and private practice sites in the United States and Germany, conducted between December 2016 and November 2017 among average-risk women aged 40 to 75 years with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts undergoing routine screening. Follow-up ascertainment of cancer diagnoses was complete through September 12, 2019.All women underwent screening by both DBT and abbreviated breast MRI, performed in randomized order and read

2020 JAMA

8. Cancer Screening: Interventions Engaging Community Health Workers – Breast Cancer

or 42 CommGuideCancerMCIPsycINFO 1. (mass screening or multiphasic screening or screen or screened or screening or "early detection of cancer").mp. 2. ((neoplasm* or ductal breast carcinoma* or "hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome") and (diagnosis or prevention)).mp. [mp=title, abstract, heading word, table of contents, key concepts, original title, tests & measures] 3. ((adenoma* or neoplasia or cancer* or neoplasm* or tumo?r* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma*) and (breast or cervical (...) or screening).ti,ab. or "early detection of cancer"/ 20. (neoplasms/ or breast neoplasms/ or colorectal neoplasms/ or uterine cervical neoplasms/ or carcinoma, ductal, breast/ or "hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome"/ or inflammatory breast neoplasms/ or colonic neoplasms/ or rectal neoplasms/) and (di or pc).fs. 21. ((adenoma* or neoplasia or cancer* or neoplasm* or tumo?r* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma*) and (breast or cervical or cervix or colon or colorectal or crc)).ti,ab. 22. 20 or 21 23

2020 Community Preventive Services Task Force

9. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. (Abstract)

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines. The European Commission Initiative for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis guidelines (European Breast Guidelines) are coordinated by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. The target audience for the guidelines includes women, health professionals, and policymakers.An international guideline panel of 28 multidisciplinary members, including patients, developed questions and corresponding (...) of the European Breast Guidelines provides recommendations regarding organized screening programs for women aged 40 to 75 years who are at average risk. The recommendations address digital mammography screening and the addition of hand-held ultrasonography, automated breast ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging compared with mammography alone. The recommendations also discuss the frequency of screening and inform decision making for women at average risk who are recalled for suspicious lesions or who

2020 Annals of Internal Medicine

10. Digital Tomosynthesis for the Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

Digital Tomosynthesis for the Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines Digital Tomosynthesis for the Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines | CADTH.ca Find the information you need Digital Tomosynthesis for the Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines Digital Tomosynthesis for the Screening and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer (...) for breast cancer diagnosis? What is the comparative clinical effectiveness of synthetic 2D mammography compared with conventional 2D digital mammography obtained with 3D digital tomosynthesis? What is the cost effectiveness of 3D digital tomosynthesis with or without 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone for breast cancer screening or diagnosis? What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of 3D digital tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis? Key Message Seven

2019 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

11. Strategies to Identify Women at High Risk of Advanced Breast Cancer During Routine Screening for Discussion of Supplemental Imaging Full Text available with Trip Pro

Strategies to Identify Women at High Risk of Advanced Breast Cancer During Routine Screening for Discussion of Supplemental Imaging Federal legislation proposes requiring that screening mammography reports to practitioners and women incorporate breast density information and that women with dense breasts discuss supplemental imaging with their practitioner given their increased risk of interval breast cancer. Instead of discussing supplemental imaging with all women with dense breasts, it may (...) be more efficient to identify women at high risk of advanced breast cancer who may benefit most from supplemental imaging.To identify women at high risk of advanced breast cancer to target woman-practitioner discussions about the need for supplemental imaging.This prospective cohort study assessed 638 856 women aged 40 to 74 years who had 1 693 163 screening digital mammograms taken at Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) imaging facilities from January 3, 2005, to December 31, 2014. Data

2019 EvidenceUpdates

12. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial Full Text available with Trip Pro

Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial Digital breast tomosynthesis is an advancement of mammography, and has the potential to overcome limitations of standard digital mammography. This study aimed to compare first-generation digital breast tomo-synthesis including two-dimensional (2D) synthetic mammograms versus digital mammography in a population-based screening (...) cancer, stratified by screening technique (ie, digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography). A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography, defined as the crude risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs for screen-detected breast cancer for women screened during the recruitment period. A per-protocol approach was used in the analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02835625, and is closed

2019 EvidenceUpdates

13. Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians. The purpose of this guidance statement is to provide advice to clinicians on breast cancer screening in average-risk women based on a review of existing guidelines and the evidence they include.This guidance statement is derived from an appraisal of selected guidelines from around the world that address breast cancer screening, as well as their included evidence. All national (...) is all clinicians, and the target patient population is all asymptomatic women with average risk for breast cancer.In average-risk women aged 40 to 49 years, clinicians should discuss whether to screen for breast cancer with mammography before age 50 years. Discussion should include the potential benefits and harms and a woman's preferences. The potential harms outweigh the benefits in most women aged 40 to 49 years.In average-risk women aged 50 to 74 years, clinicians should offer screening

2019 Annals of Internal Medicine

14. Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening

Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Management Briefs eBrief-no152 -- Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Enter search terms Button to search HSRD ® Inside VA Budget and Performance Inside the News Room National Observances Special Events » » » » » Management Briefs eBrief-no152 -- Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Health Services Research & Development Management eBrief no. 152 » Issue 152 April 2019 (...) The report is a product of the VA/HSR&D Evidence Synthesis Program. Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-Report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Guideline-based breast and cervical cancer screening are considered essential health benefits and are fundamental components of high-quality primary care services in the United States. The aim of cancer screening is to identify cancers in an early stage when treatment is more likely to be effective. Accurate measurement of cancer screening rates is vital

2019 Veterans Affairs - R&D

15. Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women Full Text available with Trip Pro

reviews showed that women aged 39 to 49 years derived the lowest absolute benefit in terms of deaths prevented ( , ) ( ). Observational studies showed larger relative reductions in breast cancer mortality ( ). Evidence from RCTs (fair quality) and observational studies (poor quality) did not show a reduction in the incidence of advanced disease with breast cancer screening in women aged 39 to 49 years (pooled results from 4 RCTs: relative risk, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.37]) ( ). Screening intervals (...) diagnostic accuracy characteristics regarding cancer detection, false-positive results, recalls, and biopsy rates. Compared with conventional mammography, DBT seems to reduce recall rates and increase cancer detection ( ). The effect of these more sensitive imaging methods on the spectrum of detected disease and associated screening benefits and harms, including overdiagnosis, is not known. Alternative or Adjunctive Tests to Screening Mammography in Women Who Have Dense Breasts Increased breast density

2019 American College of Physicians

16. Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening

Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Enter search terms Button to search HSRD ® Inside VA Budget and Performance Inside the News Room National Observances Special Events » » » » » Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Health Services Research & Development Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening to the ESP Report RSS feed Prepared by: Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating (...) Center Portland VA Health Care System Portland, OR Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, MS, Director Recommended Citation: Anderson J, Bourne D, Peterson, K, Mackey K. Evidence Brief: Accuracy of Self-report for Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening. VA ESP Project #09-199; 2019. Download PDF: , Purpose The ESP Coordinating Center (ESP CC) is responding to a request from the VHA Performance Workgroup for an evidence brief on the accuracy of patient self-report for cervical and breast cancer screening. Findings from

2019 Veterans Affairs Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports

17. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women 40-74 years of age who are not at increased risk

Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women 40-74 years of age who are not at increased risk Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer | CMAJ Main menu User menu Search Search for this keyword Search for this keyword Guideline Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer Scott Klarenbach , Nicki Sims-Jones , Gabriela Lewin (...) POINTS Low-certainty evidence indicates that screening for breast cancer with mammography results in a modest reduction in breast cancer mortality for women aged 40 to 74 years; the absolute benefit is lowest for women younger than 50 years. Screening may lead to overdiagnosis, resulting in unnecessary treatment of cancer that would not have caused harm in a woman’s lifetime and false-positive results that can lead to both physical and psychological consequences; overdiagnosis and false-positives

2018 Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

18. Should This Woman With Dense Breasts Receive Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. (Abstract)

for breast cancer. In addition, for women with dense breasts, small tumors may be missed on mammography and the sensitivity of screening is diminished. At the time of publication, 35 states had passed laws mandating that breast density be reported in the letters that radiologists send to women with their mammogram results. The mandated language may be challenging for patients to understand, and such reporting may increase worry for women who are told that their risk for breast cancer is higher than (...) Should This Woman With Dense Breasts Receive Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Breast cancer will develop in 12% of women during their lifetime and is the second leading cause of cancer death among U.S. women. Mammography is the most commonly used tool to screen for breast cancer. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding the age at which to begin screening and the optimal screening interval. Breast density is a risk factor

2018 Annals of Internal Medicine

19. Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Breast Cancer Screening in Latin America and the Caribbean: An In-Depth Narrative Review Full Text available with Trip Pro

Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes About Breast Cancer Screening in Latin America and the Caribbean: An In-Depth Narrative Review Purpose Breast cancer (BCA) is the most common cancer and leading cause of cancer mortality among women in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), and the number of deaths from BCA is expected to continue to increase. Although barriers to care include the physical accessibility of screening resources, personal and cultural barriers must be explored to understand (...) to identify articles. Thirty-five articles were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Themes identified in the literature included knowledge about screening procedures and cause of cancer; knowledge sources; catalysts and deterrents for screening, such as family support, family history; social support or taboo, fear, self-neglect, cost, and transportation; and the perception of the screening experience. Conclusion In addition to physical availability of resources and health care

2018 Journal of global oncology

20. Breast cancer screening

choose to begin biennial screening between the ages of 40 and 49 years. • For women who are at average risk for breast cancer , most of the benefit of mammography results from biennial screening during ages 50 to 74 years. Of all of the age groups, women aged 60 to 69 2016 5. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease diagnosed in women worldwide (...) Breast cancer screening Top results for breast cancer screening - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Turning Research Into Practice ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest